<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baptists and the emerging church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emergingrichmond.org/2009/11/baptists-and-the-emerging-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emergingrichmond.org/2009/11/baptists-and-the-emerging-church/</link>
	<description>a node in the emerging world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:20:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Dempster</title>
		<link>http://www.emergingrichmond.org/2009/11/baptists-and-the-emerging-church/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Dempster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingrichmond.org/?p=98#comment-26</guid>
		<description>True enough!  A jigsaw puzzle has only one correct order; a block house has no such limits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True enough!  A jigsaw puzzle has only one correct order; a block house has no such limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.emergingrichmond.org/2009/11/baptists-and-the-emerging-church/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingrichmond.org/?p=98#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I had a conversation today about one of the famous (infamous?) purpose in life books.  I proposed that there is a danger in preaching to people that they are special because people will interpret that as they (plural) are special when in fact it is you (singular) and you ( singular) and you (singular) etc that is special.  When the group is special it can breed hatred, bigotry, and a whole other host of potentially counterproductive thoughts.  When you (singular) are special, then it demands that you realize that each of the &quot;others&quot; are special too.

I like the building blocks too because my block house keeps changing as I see what can made of the blocks.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a conversation today about one of the famous (infamous?) purpose in life books.  I proposed that there is a danger in preaching to people that they are special because people will interpret that as they (plural) are special when in fact it is you (singular) and you ( singular) and you (singular) etc that is special.  When the group is special it can breed hatred, bigotry, and a whole other host of potentially counterproductive thoughts.  When you (singular) are special, then it demands that you realize that each of the &#8220;others&#8221; are special too.</p>
<p>I like the building blocks too because my block house keeps changing as I see what can made of the blocks.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Dempster</title>
		<link>http://www.emergingrichmond.org/2009/11/baptists-and-the-emerging-church/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Dempster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emergingrichmond.org/?p=98#comment-23</guid>
		<description>What I found most interesting is how completely the article was misuderstood by the first person who commented on it.  The whole analogy of difference--a &quot;jigsaw puzzle&quot; view vs. a &quot;building blocks&quot; view--was lost on the commenter, who is stuck on the greater &quot;meaning&quot; of each of the blocks, as if a building block has any meaning apart from what gets built with it.  This is the whole point, isn&#039;t it?  That, in a postmodern view, no individual block has ANY meaning outside of the context of the individual&#039;s own experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I found most interesting is how completely the article was misuderstood by the first person who commented on it.  The whole analogy of difference&#8211;a &#8220;jigsaw puzzle&#8221; view vs. a &#8220;building blocks&#8221; view&#8211;was lost on the commenter, who is stuck on the greater &#8220;meaning&#8221; of each of the blocks, as if a building block has any meaning apart from what gets built with it.  This is the whole point, isn&#8217;t it?  That, in a postmodern view, no individual block has ANY meaning outside of the context of the individual&#8217;s own experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

